About and around the perception and
interfaces Continuum
@@@@@
Seiko Mikami
Projects have been making works that involve on human perception. A
certain significance called perception -- it is complex and is a subject matter
with a too wide area. There is also a reality that we do not understand the
thing of our body well yet. In order to approach these, I decided to
disassemble these individual senses: seeing, hearing, the sense of touch, and
other, and I am advancing the project, making each interface separately. The
point of each project was to create theeinterfacefset to each perception by
elaborating a particular censor mechanism. Meanwhile, my entire project is
motivated by a conviction that something like what we call einterfacef in the
context of computer technology already exists within us. The interface that is
composed in each of my projects functions as an extension of what we already
have--a network that mediates our subjectivity that synthesizes what we
perceive and the world that is perceived. My projects make the audience
experience their own state of perceptions. By the ambiguous function of a
certain kind especially of consciousness, data are always unsteady and have the
realization that it is a thing accompanied by complicated body and brain
function as a project is advanced. The inarticulacy which cannot be noticed in
01 of digitized data but it has turned out that it can express more complex by
becoming real-time feedback (data which let the body pass). My project is made
centering on saying "the interface itself exists inside us". The
interface currently used in each project has played a role like the motor which
detects between the bodies and space which are perceived. The point is like
"the between/ inter-medium" of the information interchange of the
perception which takes place there itself or the body which appears in the
relation, and space.@Since it is such, I am making the work about sense of sight, sense
of hearing, sense of touch
and sense of gravity. I have offered to audio and visualized that it is not
conventional perceptionfs function.@Thus my proposition is: gthe eye is not
merely a thing that sees and the ear is not merely a thing that hears; it is
possible for the ear to see, for the nose to hear, and for the eye to touch.h
